tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-64531659806965472902024-03-08T10:19:14.917-08:00The Cascadian ChronicleCascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-5255683310470936172011-03-16T16:09:00.000-07:002011-03-16T16:09:12.616-07:00Get Involved in Local Emergency ManagementEmergency management and disaster response is too important to be left to professionals and to governments, if for no other reason than those two groups will be overwhelmed by a big disaster, as the events in Japan have shown over the past week. One good way for individuals to learn more about how to be useful in an emergency is to participate in a <a href="http://www.citizencorps.gov/cert/">CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) Program</a>. Besides general information about the program, the site has an index of local CERT programs, so you can find one close to you.Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-75375688824042755322011-03-16T11:10:00.000-07:002011-03-16T11:10:56.538-07:00Washington State Comprehensive Emergency Management PlanIn light of recent events in Japan, I thought I would look into the state of emergency planning in Cascadia. The first thing I have dug up is the <a href="http://www.emd.wa.gov/plans/documents/CompleteCEMP.pdf">Washington State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan</a> (499 pg. pdf).Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-62135575507978622772011-02-26T21:58:00.000-08:002011-03-09T10:42:24.208-08:00Most Significant Peaks in CascadiaThe most significant peaks (over 4,000 meters) in Cascadia are: <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Mount_Logan.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="130" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Mount_Logan.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Mount Logan</td></tr>
</tbody></table><ul><li>Mount Logan 5,959 m</li>
<li>Mount Rainier 4,392 m (Tahoma)</li>
<li>Mount Shasta 4,322 m</li>
<li>Grand Teton 4,199 m</li>
<li>Mount Waddington 4,019 m (Mystery Mountain) </li>
</ul>The St. Elias Range is one of the highest in North America, and includes eight other peaks, besides Mount Logan, which have an elevation over 4,000 m and which lie inside the borders of Cascadia. These are:<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.knowledgerush.com/wiki_image/e/e0/Mt_Rainier_distant-600px.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="133" src="http://www.knowledgerush.com/wiki_image/e/e0/Mt_Rainier_distant-600px.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Tahoma</td></tr>
</tbody></table><ul><li>Mount Saint Elias 5,489 m</li>
<li>Mount Vancouver 4,812 m</li>
<li>Mount Fairweather 4,671 m</li>
<li>Mount Hubbard 4,577 m</li>
<li>Mount Alverstone 4,439 m</li>
<li>McArthur Peak 4,389 m</li>
<li>Mount Augusta 4,289 m</li>
<li>Mount Cook 4,196 m<br />
</li>
</ul><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://pauldeanno.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/mt-shasta.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="150" src="http://pauldeanno.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/mt-shasta.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Mount Shasta</td></tr>
</tbody></table>Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-68103135218761189942011-02-10T14:32:00.000-08:002011-02-10T14:32:36.776-08:00Tips for Starting a Community GardenOne of the biggest issues facing us as we deal with resource depletion will be keeping ourselves fed. By necessity, we will need to grow more food closer to home. One way to encourage movement in this direction is to promote local neighborhood gardens (also known as community gardens or P-patches). If you don't have one in your neighborhood, start one! I know from personal experience that it takes no special experience or knowledge to establish a new community garden.<br />
<br />
My tips:<br />
<ol><li> <b>Find a good location.</b> This can seem like the hardest part, but it is not that difficult. Talk to local churches (many of whom have large underused church yards and who are institutionally interested in helping to feed the hungry), community centers, and schools to see if they have land they could set aside for a community garden. Also talk to local government - sometimes, local government is willing to set aside land for a community garden.</li>
<li><b>Find partners.</b> Local garden clubs are a great place to start, as they will often have a bunch of members who are eager to participate. Other community organizations may be able to help as well.</li>
<li><b>Advertise what you are doing.</b> Try to get an article in the local paper or at least write a Letter to the Editor describing what you are doing. Also, if your partner group(s) has a website, advertise on that.</li>
<li><b>Solicit donations.</b> Local businesses may be able to help provide materials, particularly if you have a clear plan and specific requests. Also, there are many grant-making non-profit organizations that can help if you submit requests.</li>
<li><b>Find a mentor. </b>There are a surprising number of people out there who at one time or another have been involved with a community garden. Find them and learn all you can from their experience.</li>
<li><b>Just do it!</b> Enough said.</li>
</ol>If you have specific questions about how to make a community garden happen in your neighborhood, please feel free to contact me, and I will help in any way that I can.Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-53030153466163815002011-02-04T09:37:00.000-08:002011-02-04T09:40:46.713-08:00Cascadian News Roundup<a href="http://oregon's%20aprovecho%20research%20center%20builds%20stoves%20to%20help%20the%20environment,%20health%20and%20humanityregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2011/02/post_23.html">Oregon's Aprovecho Research Center builds stoves to help the environment, health and humanity</a> This is a great example of development of appropriate technology that actually meets the needs of people. It isn't glamorous, but it works great!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://fate%20of%20border-crossing%20wolves%20in%20hands%20of%20u.s.%20judgeread%20more/">Fate of border-crossing wolves in hands of U.S. judge</a> This situation is a great example of why our political structures need to be designed with bio-regionalism in mind. The wolves don't care at all about the 49th Parallel.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://tea%20party%20boise%20backs%20nullification%20of%20federal%20laws%20at%20upcoming%20hearingread%20more/">Tea Party Boise backs nullification of federal laws at upcoming hearing</a> As an advocate for less federal power (eventually leading to the elimination of federal power) I am theoretically in favor of this. However, like the situation in Egypt, letting regions actually practice self-government may lead to situations where regions make silly choices.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014101898_99tunnel02m.html">Tunnel opponents must wait for fall vote on I-101</a><br />
<a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2011/02/panel_rejects_pricey_innovative_design_for_portland-to-vancouver_bridge_suggests_three_cheaper_plans.html">Panel rejects pricey, innovative design for Portland-to-Vancouver bridge; suggests three cheaper plans</a> Cascadia is still trapped in the mindset that using vast amounts of resources to build new automobile infrastructure is a good idea as oil supplies decline.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Labour+dispute+blamed+slowdown+ports/4213447/story.html">Labour dispute blamed for slowdown at B.C. ports</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bclocalnews.com/greater_vancouver/burnabynewsleader/business/115143444.html">Ports already feeling pain of possible strike</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2014123871_guest04lanza.html">A Bank of Washington could help state businesses on road to recovery</a> This may be a good first step to declaring Cascadian economic independence from the Federal Reserve System.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014113100_stateads03m.html">Bill proposes state websites should sell advertising</a> Advertising is what makes our consumerist society consume, and consumerism is a major source of our current difficulties. This is a horrendously bad idea that nonetheless will probably pass.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/Metro+mansions+Province+asked+help+curb+sprawl+land/4221999/story.html">Metro vs. mansions: Province asked to help curb sprawl on ALR land</a> Metro Vancouver officials are worrid about the right thing: How will we feed ourselves if we allow agricultural land to be devoured by sprawl?Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-49092379668886890142011-02-02T15:04:00.000-08:002011-02-02T15:04:09.490-08:00Throwing Perfectly Good Money into a Hole in the GroundIt looks like the debate about a tunnel replacement for the Alaska Way Viaduct in downtown Seattle is nowhere near over. Most recently, as a result of an initiative filed Tuesday, the city will <a href="http://vote%20in%20november%20about%20whether%20to%20allow%20the%20state%20to%20build%20a%20planned%20tunnelseattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014101898_99tunnel02m.html">vote in November about whether to allow the State to build a planned tunnel</a>. Replacing the Alaska Way Viaduct doesn't make sense, and replacing it with the most expensive and riskiest replacement idea just compounds the error.<br />
<br />
Some reasons we should stop all expansion of automobile infrastructure and take advantage of opportunities to reduce it:<br />
<ul><li>The world is past peak oil, so one way or another the amount people drive is going to have to fall.</li>
<li>The American Empire uses about 3-4 times its fair share of oil based on population, mainly due to economic and military dominance. Eventually, we can expect that the rest of the world will decide this arrangement no longer suits them, and then we can expect the amount of automobile usage to decline dramatically. Why not plan for this future and accept it gracefully rather than go on kicking and screaming like a two-year old about our lifestyle being "non-negotiable". We'll get to the same place either way, the only difference is how much pain we inflict on ourselves by fighting it.</li>
<li>This state desperately needs the money that will be used on this project to finance other things, like basic health care and education.</li>
</ul>Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-996531514382762012011-02-01T08:50:00.000-08:002011-02-01T08:50:36.919-08:00Public Banking for CascadiaYes! Magazine reported last week that <a href="http://washington%20state%20joins%20the%20movement%20for%20public%20banking/">Washington State Joins the Movement for Public Banking</a>. To anybody who is familiar with the history and success of the 92-year-old, publicly owned Bank of North Dakota, this is is very good news indeed, although judging by the low level of local news coverage, it is hard to say if the idea is going anywhere in the Legislature. The predictably pro-oligarchy Seattle Times has been dismissive of the idea (<a href="http://so%20much%20for%20a%20state%20bank/">So much for a state bank</a>). But the advantages of a state-owned bank, vs. continuing to send the state's money to Wall Street to earn profits for bank shareholders rather than for our own citizens and government, are pretty strong:<br />
<ul><li>A public bank doesn't pay outrageous salaries and bonuses to executives, or reward them for the sort of reckless risk taking that brought Wall Street down in 2008 and is threatening to do so again.</li>
<li>Profits on the savings held by the state stay in the state rather than being funnelled off as bank profits to private shareholders.</li>
<li>A public bank is better able to provide affordable credit to local business.</li>
<li>A public bank would be operated in a financially conservative manner. The Bank of North Dakota remained profitable throughout the recent credit crisis unlike banks such as Bank of America, which Washington State currently uses to hold state savings.</li>
<li>Unlike most of the banking system, which is private in name only (for more on this, read <a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/09/why-do-we-keep-indulging-the-fiction-that-banks-are-private-enterprises.html">Why Do We Keep Indulging the Fiction That Banks Are Private Enterprises?</a>), profits are privatized and losses are socialized (i.e., paid by taxpayers). A state bank would socialize the profits and could very conceivably avoid the losses, because it would be run like a bank and not like the current Wall Street casino.</li>
</ul>Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-35628252271175702122011-01-31T10:13:00.000-08:002011-01-31T10:13:09.536-08:00The Hypocrisy of EmpireConsider the following recent events:<br />
<ul><li>The U.S. response to the imprisonment of Liu Xiaobo</li>
<li>The U.S. response to the uprising in Egypt</li>
<li>The U.S. response to the Wikileaks revelations</li>
</ul>In the first case, the U.S. is doing a tolerably good job of defending the principle of freedom of speech. Of course, the speaker in this case is criticizing a U.S. rival, so in now way is he doing anything to upset the interests of the Empire.<br />
<br />
In the second case, the Empire has been caught between its rhetoric in support of "democracy" and support for our chosen dictator in this part of the world. As a result, the U.S. response has been weak and ineffectual, and it is hard to imagine that the gap between rhetoric and action will endear Empire to the population of Egypt.<br />
<br />
In the third case, because the interests of Empire have been directly attacked (or more accurately, the U.S. hasn't been attacked, Wikileaks has merely been shining a flashlight into dark corners that the government would rather not have investigated), the principle of freedom of speech clearly has no applicability here, at least in the eyes of the Empire.<br />
<br />
So, we learn from these examples that the U.S. only supports freedom of speech that is agreeable to the U.S. government. Furthermore, these examples are hardly unique: of hundreds of examples I could choose from, I picked these because they are fairly recent.<br />
<br />
I am convinced that even more than thuggish behavior, the thing that most upsets people is hypocrisy, and the Empire is drenched in hypocrisy. Of course, to maintain an Empire, perhaps it is necessary to engage in widescale hypocrisy - otherwise, there would be no justifiable rationale for the Empire.<br />
<br />
One way or another, I expect this Empire will eventually collapse. When it does, I hope that whatever nation arises in its place in Cascadia has enough sense and humility to deal with the world honestly, so that even if not powerful, it is a nation that can be respected.Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-44690615760031001632011-01-28T21:47:00.000-08:002011-01-28T21:47:28.941-08:00High Speed Rail in Cascadia?I recently ran across a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/High-Speed-Rail-for-Washington-USA/148057741910351">Facebook page for "High-Speed Rail for Washington, USA"</a>. Frankly, this seems to be rather a pie-in-the-sky goal. At least they are focusing on the right goal - get people out of cars and airplanes and into a much more efficient and environmentally friendly mode of transportation. However, we don't even have passenger rail of any sort throughout huge swathes of Cascadia! Take a look at this <a href="http://www.trainwacko.com/images/LargeAmtrakSystemMap.gif">Amtrak system map</a>. Amtrak won't get you within 100 miles of Yakima, which has a population of 85,000 people and is the 10th largest city in Washington. Amtrak doesn't even get within 200 miles of Boise, Idaho's capital and largest city (and that's via Nevada, not even a part of Cascadia).<br />
<br />
As we enter the Long Emergency of declining energy supplies, passenger rail service may be the only viable means of overland transport outside of riding a horse or walking. Huge areas of Cascadia may really suffer if we don't make an effort to build a passenger rail system that is at least up to third-world standards before it is too late. Let's lay off the dreams of a high-speed rail system in some never-to-come Techno-Utopia, and instead concentrate on building something that will meet the needs of real people in the real future we are likely to experience.Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-27329464639022178292011-01-05T12:48:00.000-08:002011-01-27T09:42:50.242-08:00Cascadian IndependenceAs things continue to deteriorate around the world and at home, the case for us in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_(independence_movement)">Cascadia to get off the train of Empire</a> gets stronger and stronger. Here are some links to groups that are working toward this goal:<br />
<ul><li><a href="http://cascadianow.org/">Cascadian Independence Project</a></li>
<li><a href="http://zapatopi.net/cascadia/">The Republic of Cascadia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cascadiacommons.org/">Cascadia Commons</a></li>
<li>A <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/nv/micronations/cascadia.html">list of Cascadia-related websites</a></li>
</ul>At the present, none of these initiatives seems likely to gain much of a following, but as the collapse of the Empire proceeds, hopefully ways to proactively and peacefully obtain Cascadian independence will begin to gather momentum.Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-69263399226277114942010-12-09T10:50:00.000-08:002010-12-09T10:50:50.869-08:00Shaping the Collapse of the EmpireOne of my starting assumptions when thinking about the future is that the collapse of industrial civilization is inevitable. Occasionally, there is a debate among Peak Oil aware circles about whether we are facing a quick collapse or a slow, grinding, long collapse. (There are some who say that Peak Oil does not equal collapse in our present context, but they can be safely ignored.) The question I propose to address here is: if we could choose, what sort of collapse would be most desirable (or, more accurately, least awful)?<br />
<br />
There are some who argue that a slow collapse would be better, because it could mitigate some suffering, allow us to prepare for a better social organization post-collapse, etc. The problem I see with this point of view is that is presumes that we will retain a reasonable political order all the way down the collapse curve. However, it seems more likely that we will face political turmoil and potential collapse earlier rather than later in this process. The history of the Great Depression in Europe, and particularly in Germany, is instructive in this regard. What arises may almost certainly be, in some form, a malignant political order that does not respond well to the efforts of individuals who are outside the systems of power to effect positive change.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, a quick collapse, while distinctly unpleasant, at least has the virtue of taking out more of the systems of state power before they can be used in bad ways against the populace. It also will probably be better for ecological systems, in that the ruthless exploitation that industrial civilization practices will come to an end sooner than it would in a slow collapse. If we all become poor relatively quickly, there will certainly be violence, injustice, and hardship, but that will be more manageable if most state power has collapsed as well, rather than if we continue to extend and pretend in a way that props up, as much as possible, industrial civilization and state power turns into something diabolical.<br />
<br />
Having established that I would prefer a fast collapse to a slow collapse, what, if anything, can individuals ethically do to bring this preferred option about? Here are some of the ideas I have:<br />
<ul><li>Shine a spotlight, using all available means, on the nature and abuses of Imperial power, so that ones friends and neighbors understand why it is crucial to withdraw their support. As Wikileaks is proving, daylight is the mortal enemy of Empire.</li>
<li>Discharge all indebtedness - preferably by paying it down and not incurring new debt, but default may be acceptable as well. The Empire's economic system relies on indebtedness and interest payments to function. In conjunction with this, find ways to preserve your assets outside the banking (and credit union) system.</li>
<li>Withdraw, to the maximum extent possible, from the money economy.</li>
<li>Find your life's purpose and meaning in something besides materialism.</li>
</ul>I do not advocate for violent resistance to the empire, because by pursuing violence, we would simply turn ourselves into that which we claim to oppose.Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-85306923069442540062010-12-07T15:21:00.000-08:002010-12-07T15:21:42.236-08:00Videos You Must See<a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-7-2010/foreclosure-crisis">Jon Stewart on Foreclosuregate</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26820.htm">Chris Hedges on the Death of the Liberal Class</a> (Also the title of his most recent book)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpmlHTeVG9A">What the Federal Reserve is up to</a>Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-32821184790172915602010-12-07T08:16:00.000-08:002010-12-07T08:16:07.458-08:00JP Morgan About to Crash in Failed Attempt to Manipulate Silver Markets?<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/12/06/benzinga668905.DTL">J.P. Morgan Getting Squeezed In Silver Market?</a> (San Francisco Chronicle)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gl47z2g2EvI">J.P. Morgan Silver Manipulation Explained</a> (Youtube Video)<br />
<br />
And there are now rumors circulating about shortages of physical silver on the market.Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-42051949007990674602010-12-06T15:08:00.000-08:002010-12-06T16:05:24.932-08:00Not a Good Week to be PoorOf course, there never is a good time to be poor.<br />
<br />
But in the past week we have <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2013564555_apusjoblessbenefitsthe99ers.html">Holidays about survival as jobless benefits end</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Congressional opponents of extending the benefits beyond this month say fiscal responsibility should come first. Republicans in the House and Senate, along with a handful of conservative Democrats, say they're open to extending benefits, but not if it means adding to the $13.8 trillion national debt.</blockquote>But apparently unfunded tax cuts for those earning millions annually are an acceptable reason to add to the deficit.<br />
<br />
And in Olympia, the nominally democratic governor is proposing <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2013506856_apwagregoirebudget.html">elimination of the state's Basic Health Plan</a>, which exists to serve those who otherwise simply won't have health coverage.<br />
<br />
Apparently there are a whole lot of people currently in politics who think that Hoover had the right ideas in 1931.<br />
<br />
ETA: Apparently the Congress and the President have reached an agreement to extend both unemployment benefits (for people who desperately need them) and tax cuts for the top 2% (definitely not needed).Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6453165980696547290.post-23815528197477758652010-11-30T15:29:00.000-08:002010-11-30T15:29:48.828-08:00Where Are We Now?I am starting this blog as a way to chronicle the events in the world and in my little corner of the planet, Cascadia, as the crises of the Long Emergency begin to appear with increasing force and urgency. From where I sit, here are some of the major stories that are unfolding even as we speak:<br />
<ul><li>Global oil production is at least 2 or 3 years past peak, and it is highly possible that totally global energy production is past peak. This one fact will lead inexorably to economic and political disruptions for decades to come.</li>
<li>The United States of America is more and more clearly an Empire in all but name, and a declining one at that. This Empire will refuse to collapse in an orderly manner, resulting in much hardship around the globe and at home.</li>
<li>The grand experiment of Europe, the European Union and the Euro, is on its last legs. The ahistorical peace and prosperity that Europe has enjoyed since the end of World War 2 is fast becoming a relic as the normal pattern of European history reasserts itself.</li>
<li>It is increasingly clear that the financial system of the Empire (and by extension, that of most of the world) is based on fraud and swindles. The system is past reform and will collapse, most likely in a very messy and damaging manner that will impoverish many ordinary people.</li>
<li>Democracy in the Empire is a sham. The financial and corporate worlds control all the essential parts of government. The voice of the people is only allowed to manifest itself in government in topics that the corporate world does not care about, mostly hot-button social issues.</li>
</ul>Cascadian Chroniclerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15955933565989660700noreply@blogger.com0